|
Conflict between a Reversionary Pension (RP) nomination and a Binding Death Benefit Nomination (BDBN) in a Self Managed Super Fund context
At the time of commencing a reversionary pension, the trustees must ensure if there are any binding death benefit nomination attached to their pension superannuation interest are revoked, otherwise the two documents will clash and dispute will arise if nominations are made out to two different individuals. If a member dies with reversionary pension document and if there is a BDBN pertaining to income stream is not revoked, then the trustees will have to deal with two valid documents. This can create many problems, e.g. which document should take precedence or if there is a conflict, the trustees will have to rely on the trust deed for guidance, some trust deeds are silent on this issue, this article discuss what options trustees have to avoid any future conflicts.
Click here to learn how to commence a pension in an SMSF
Reversionary Pension VS Binding Death Benefit Nomination In normal circumstances if there is a BDBN in place which reverts an income stream to the beneficiary, there should be no need to prepare any RP documents at the time of commencing a pension, provided the trust deed allows BDBN to pay pensions to the beneficiary. It has been expressly noted by ATO that a BDBN by itself may not be enough to commence a pension automatically for the beneficiary, BDBN needs the support of the governing rules of the fund.
In most cases Self Managed Super Fund (SMSF) are established when members are usually in accumulation phase and binding or non-binding nominations are executed by members to distribute (as a pension or lump sum) their accumulation superannuation interests in case of death. However, when any member commences an income stream, situation changes and depending on the size of the superannuation interest, it is possible that the member will need both documents. A reversionary pension to look after the income stream and a BDBN for any accumulation interest. Pension documents can be reversionary or non-reversionary, if the income stream is non-reversionary, the superannuation interest of the deceased must be paid out as per SISR 6.21 as soon as practical. However, many trust deeds give trustees the right to pay a death benefit pension to beneficiaries instead of a lump sum, if requested by the beneficiaries. Since there is no case law to guide professionals, SMSF industry is divided in their opinion on which one of the two document should take precedence. Many advisors believe since there is a valid reversionary pension in place (which creates a contractual right), there is nothing left over as a part of death benefit to be distributed to the BDBN beneficiary from the pension account (assets), but this is not entirely true as you will read below. In spite of what the BDBN or RP enforces on the trustees, it is important that trustees find guidelines in the governing rules of the fund. Many trust deed are either silent or do not provide a clear guidance to the trustees to which document will prevail. To make matters worse, there is no consistency among trust deeds on which document will take priority.
Click here to learn more about BDBN
|
| click here to unsubscribe from the mailing list |










All SMSFAAA webinar certificates will be marked as " FESEA Allocation - Technical competence: acting as a technically proficient professional" .