Share
Crypto, Compliance & the SMSF Deed
 
 
   

Crypto, Compliance & the SMSF Deed: A Strategic Guide for Accountants

News | Navjot Kaur | Released: 24/07/2025 | Read: 5 Mins

The SMSF Deed – Your Client’s Legal Backbone

For accountants supporting SMSF clients, the trust deed is the starting point for every compliance and strategic decision. As investment options expand—particularly into areas like cryptocurrency, property, and private lending—many older deeds are proving inadequate or overly restrictive. A deed that isn’t aligned with current legislation or investment activity can expose trustees to compliance breaches and limit strategic flexibility.

 

Key Considerations for Review:

  • Is the deed compatible with the fund's current and intended investment activities (e.g., cryptocurrency?
  • Does it permit digital recordkeeping, e-signing, and modern pension structures?
  • Has it been updated to reflect recent changes in legislation or ATO guidance?

Useful Tip: When clients initiate new investment activity, always review deed compatibility before execution. Updating the deed in time can prevent downstream audit risks and potential regulatory issues.

   

Sole Purpose Test

   

The Sole Purpose Test under section 62 of the SIS Act remains a core ATO compliance focus, particularly where SMSFs are investing in novel or high-risk asset classes.

Compliance Red Flags Accountants Should Watch For:

  • Trustees deriving any present-day benefit from fund assets (e.g., use of SMSF-owned crypto wallets for personal purposes)
  • Investment strategies that do not reflect actual practice (e.g., high-risk or speculative activity not addressed in the fund’s strategy)
  • Lack of documentation, or failure to demonstrate commercial terms for related-party transactions.

   

Case Summary: Aussiegolfa Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation

   

What was the issue?
The case looked at whether an SMSF breached the Sole Purpose Test by investing in a property that was later rented to the fund member’s daughter. The ATO originally said yes – they believed the fund was being used to provide a benefit to a relative, which is not allowed under super laws.

Background:

  • Aussiegolfa Pty Ltd was the trustee of the Benson Family SMSF, with Mr Benson as the only member.
  • The SMSF invested in a managed fund (DomaCom) that owned a property in Burwood, Victoria.
  • Later, that property was leased to Mr Benson’s daughter at market rent.
  • The ATO believed this arrangement broke the Sole Purpose Test and considered the investment an in-house asset, which may also breach the rules.

What did the court decide?
The Full Federal Court overturned the earlier ruling. Here’s what they found:

1.  No breach of the Sole Purpose Test

 

  •  The fund was not set up to house Mr Benson’s daughter.
  •  The lease was at market rent, so no financial advantage was given.
  •  There was no evidence that the SMSF was being used to provide a personal benefit to Mr Benson or   his daughter.
  • The timing of the investment mattered—the property wasn’t rented to the daughter until years after the SMSF made the investment.

 

2.  The test is objective

  •   The trustee's personal motives are not the same as the fund’s legal purpose.
  •   An internal email from Mr Benson (written in his job, not as trustee) suggesting they were “testing”  related- party use was not enough to prove a breach.

 

3.  Related-party tenants are not automatically a breach

  •   Renting to a family member can be acceptable, if done at market rent and with proper       documentation.
  •   It only becomes a problem if the arrangement gives them a financial or non-arm’s-length benefit.

 

4.  In-house asset rules still applied

  • The investment in the DomaCom sub-fund was considered an in-house asset, because all units were held by the SMSF and related parties.
   
   

What does this mean for SMSFs and accountants?

 

  • Arm’s length arrangements are key. Renting to family is not automatically non-compliant—market rent and proper processes matter.
  • The trustee’s personal motives (e.g., wanting to help their child) are not enough to prove a breach, unless they influence the fund’s decisions.
  • The purpose of the investment matters at the time it was made, not what happens later.
  • Good documentation and timing are critical—accountants should help clients keep clear records and review deeds and strategies before acting.
   

Cryptocurrency & SMSFs – Risk Profile Rising

   
https://stratus.campaign-image.com.au/images/27408000015289048_zc_v1_1752738721724_how_works.png

Cryptocurrency is a form of digital, unregulated money that uses encryption techniques to control the creation of units and verify transactions, operating independently of any central bank.

As digital assets gain popularity, many trustees are actively trading or holding cryptocurrency within their SMSF. However, accountants must ensure these investments comply with SIS regulations and ATO guidelines.

 

All investments made by a Self-Managed Super Fund (SMSF) must meet strict regulatory requirements. Trustees have a legal obligation to act in the best interests of members, with every investment decision aligning with the Sole Purpose Test — that is, serving the sole purpose of providing retirement or death benefits.

 

So, can an SMSF invest in crypto assets? That depends. The key question is whether such an investment aligns with the fund’s strategy and long-term objectives. Does it make sense in the context of building retirement savings?

 

Crucially, neither trustees nor members can receive any direct or indirect personal benefit from the crypto investment. Doing so would constitute a breach of the Sole Purpose Test.

As with many SMSF matters, the short answer is: it depends — and careful consideration is essential.

   

Minimum Compliance Checklist:

   

 

  • SMSF deed explicitly permits cryptocurrency investment
  • Crypto assets are held in a wallet exclusively in the fund’s name
  • Investment strategy clearly addresses crypto-related risks, including volatility, liquidity, and diversification
  • Independent and auditable valuation methods are used for year-end reporting
  • Transaction history and ownership documentation is complete and available for audit
   

Common Issues Identified by SMSF Auditors:

   

 

  • Blurred ownership between personal and fund assets
  • Wallets held under trustee names instead of the fund
  • Absence of updated investment strategies or resolutions approving crypto investments
  • Significant losses or value shifts not documented or explained

 Useful Tip: Encourage clients to keep cryptocurrency exposure within a reasonable threshold, and ensure   their strategy reviews are conducted at least annually.

   

Join my webinar on 6th Aug- SMSF Deeds, Sole Purpose & Crypto Explained

 

Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2025

Time: 2:30 PM to 3:30 PM

Cost: $50

CPD: 1Hour

   

What Accountants Should Be Doing Right Now ?

   

1.  Conduct trust deed reviews across your SMSF client base, especially for funds established over five years ago

2.  Identify clients with crypto, collectibles, or overseas investments for targeted compliance review

3.  Standardise investment strategy templates to include crypto and high-risk asset categories

4.  Engage SMSF auditors early when clients make non-traditional investments

5.  Educate trustees about their responsibilities around ownership, documentation, and recordkeeping

   
SMSFUPDATE
 

How We Can Support You?

   

Our portal supports Accountants and advisors to manage:

  • SMSF deed reviews and updates
  • Setting up SMSF with individual or corporate trustees
   

Visit www.trustdeed.com.au for more details or call us on(02) 9684 4199

   

Follow Us On

 You are receiving this email as you signed up for our newsletters.

 Want to change how you receive these emails?

You can Unsubscribe or Update your preferences

 
click here to unsubscribe from the mailing list
Share